Image by dantc via Flickr
Now that some of us have dismissed the new, online-only Seattle Post-Intelligencer as an utter failure 24 hours into the experiment (yes, day two was much better, and, truly, I wish them well), it's time to anticipate the longer-term future of Seattle journalism.
Some context: Before Hearst on Monday announced that the P-I would, indeed, cease the use of ink, people at the paper were twisting in the wind. For weeks, no one knew what would happen. Then a few weeks ago a magic wand tapped some two dozen of the 170 news employees on the shoulder to join a possible new online-only venture — the SeattlePI.com effort now under way "to break a lot of rules that newspaper Web sites stick to." This bifurcation of the staff upped the levels of anxiety and insecurity in the final days and hours, naturally, which helped inspire another handful of P-I journalists to consider striking out on their own once the severance checks are safely deposited.
These folks, who wish to remain nameless until the Hearst checks clear, asked me to advise them. (Now between jobs, I worked for a long time at The Seattle Times, organized and ran the Seattle Union Record during the 2000-01 newspaper strike, was managing editor of Seattle Weekly, and was the launch editor of Crosscut.) So far the relationship with these now-former P-I staffers is informal and free, but it's possible I could get more involved at some point. Anyhow, through this connection I've been privy to discussions with others in Seattle — including non-journalists — who are concerned about the future of local news. After all, The Seattle Times is in a precarious way, too.
So with that background out of the way, here's what I know about overlapping discussions about the future of news in Seattle, in light of historic disruption:
Recent Comments